Tuesday, 20 May 2014

7) The ways in which the candidates’ own experiences of media consumption illustrate wider patterns and trends of audience behaviour


e.g. Love Film, etc.

 
 
The ways in which the candidates’ own experiences of media consumption illustrate wider patterns and trends of audience behaviour
  • We can create our own films using DV Cameras and new digital technology.
  • We can edit our own films using software such as Adobe After Effects.
  • Brainwashed by Conglomerates, due to the mass of advertising and marketing, we feel as though we have to go and watch a film.
  • The cost of making films has risen due to new technologies, meaning the costs to watch films has increased.
    • e.g. we have to pay more just to see Robert Patterson with his top off in the new twilight film.
  • We become dragged into marketing campaigns, through cross-media convergence.
  • This creates a must-see feel to the film.
  • We can only watch mainly Conglomerates at cinemas.
  • This means we have a limited choice of what we watch at the cinemas.
  • ------------
  • Nowadays we are liable to consume media products through online websites, and providers of DVD-by-mail and streaming video on demand. Examples of these on demand providers include:
    • LoveFilm
    • Netflix
    • MUBI
  • We can download films via:
    • MP4 players
    • Ipads
    • Playstation
    • Xbox
  • This is what is at issue here.
  • (Visit Pearl and Dean to see how multiplex cinemas are adapting the experience of cinema-going to gain audiences)
  • In an age of falling DVD sales, stagnant home cinema figures and an increase in downloading for both music and film audience are changing in how they want to consume film. Identify trends and consider where the audience trends are going in the near future.
Working Title

For example, Working Title released "The Boat That Rocked" in 2009

Question 2 Examples


Intro - There is a huge difference within the film industry, exemplified by the issues of media ownership on bigger budget films and the low budget films. There is a significant difference with films like Shifty, compared to Working Title. For example, Working Title productions have a large budget, compared to the film Shifty, which was made by Microwave. Media ownership can have a wide impact on whether the audience is universal, or a specific target audience.
Paragraph 1 - The simple budget of Working Title started off at around £3 million, which was their first feature film, My Beautiful Laundrette (1984), which was a social realist film exemplifying homophobia. Nowadays, Working Title make films for £20 million and onwards. This may be because of the trans-Atlantic feel Working Title have added to their films, due to overseas producers, such as American producers, coming over and taking over Working Title productions. This means the films loose some of their ‘Britishness’.
Paragraph 2 - Shifty was funded by Microwave, and produced by Between the Eyes, and Film London. It was a social realist film exemplifying criminals, made for a budget of £100,000. The budget differentiates from Working Title, as their films usually have a more ‘British’ feel to them. It has a more niche audience, which may not appeal to a bigger audience. British audiences’ can relate to these issues, who can see this as “a slice of life”, whereas bigger audiences’ would not appeal to it.


Intro - I agree that cross-media convergence and synergy are vital processes in the successful marketing of media products to audiences. Synergy is the simultaneous release of different products to boost both, and is most often used by bigger companies, often media conglomerates. Cross-media convergence is the combining of two or more mediums, such as film and music (e.g. The Boat that Rocked). However…
FOR
Synergy
  • They boost different boosts
  • The film studio, record label, etc. create linked products (e.g. the film, the soundtrack)
  • Create a big franchise – it can appeal to different  audiences/ages (e.g. radio appeals to elderly people, music appeals to the younger people).
  • Promotes less popular mediums (e.g. soundtrack)
  • The film can promote the music, which can promote the radio, which can promote the magazines… and so on
  • Give examples of Shifty and Working Title
Cross-media convergence
  • Can happen in the production, distribution or exhibition
  • Convergence of magazines can lead to websites
Intro - Digital distribution affects the marketing and consumption of media products in Working Title and Shifty. Marketing techniques include DVDs, Blu-Ray. We consume media products through streaming, piracy and viral marketing.


Friday, 2 May 2014

Working Titles

Film -
  • a study of a specific studio/production company within a contemporary film industry that targets a British audience.
  • through
    • marketing
    • exhibition
    • etc.
Synergy -
  • several companies working on the same thing

Working Titles
  • Founded in 1984
    • co-founded by:
      • Tim Bevan
      • Sarah Radclyffe
      • Graham Bradstreet
    • in 1992
      • Sarah Radclyffe left the company
      • Eric Fellner joined the company
  • UK films aimed at an international audience
  • Traditional UK film genres
  • Their history mirrors the history of the UK film industry
  • Increasingly typical UK film funding
    • (co-funding with British TV companies and Hollywood studios)
  • Produced "My Beautiful Laundrette" (1985)
  • Produced "For Queen and Country" (1988)
    • starring Denzel Washington
    • their first Anglo-American production
  • British film + American Star = $$$$$$$$$$$$ (BIG MONEY!!!!)
  • Appeals to international market (and success for the British Film Industry (BFI))
    • This approach has provoked much criticism about the 'mid-Atlantic' nature of the films
  • They are all basically the same (formulaic)
  • UK/US co-productions...
    • 5% (of the time) - developing a script
    • 5% (of the time) - finding a director
    • 90% (of the time) - juggling deals together from different sources
  • ...to finance those films
  • By handshaking with 'Polygram', they got 'Universal Pictures' involved.
  • Films produced:
    • Shaun of the Dead
    • Hot Fuzz
    • At World's End
    • Billy Elliott
    • Bridget Jones: Diary
    • Nanny McPhee
    • The Boat That Rocked
      • released in the UK on April 1st 2009
      • budget of $50 million
      • Richard Curtis romantic comedies have traditionally done very well at the box office
      • Typical Working Title co-production with Universal and Canal+
      • Familiar Working Title faces and some up-and-coming talent
      • Famous US star (Phillip Seymour Hoffman)
      • Traditional marketing campaign with synergestic merchandising and tie-ins - soundtrack released on Mercury Records owned by Universal...
      • Increasingly traditional digital marketing strategies (TV commercials, social media)
      • Large scale release - 400+ sceens in UK
      • Medium scale release in US - 800+ screens
      • It died in the UK yet it still did quite well in the US
    • Thunderbirds
  • Most films make a profit from their films, although some have flopped.

Friday, 21 March 2014

Proliferation and Negative Distribution

Proliferation
  • a rapid and often excessive spread or increase.

  • the increase in film piracy has become a serious concern for the film industry.
  • piracy costs the industry money and undermines the position and control of the producer.
  • the proliferation of piracy is the biggest concern for the film industry.
  • piracy referred to as "negative distribution", and is illegal but very difficult to control.


Negative Distribution
  • films being distributed/shared illegally.

A report for Motion Picture Association (all the big studios) found that
  • they lost $6.1 billion a year.
  • the industry itself lost $18.2 billion.
  • of the $18.2 billion, $7.1 billion was due to internet piracy.

New technology has made piracy easier.

Everyone has the ability to do this because of convergence of technology and the affordability of this.

The control moves from the institution to the audience.

Smaller companies are affected more - they can not afford the losses.


Reasons for film piracy:

  • Cheaper way of accessing the film
  • It is easy to do for the consumers
  • Quicker/faster way of accessing the film
  • Accessible from the comfort of your own home
  • Because of the poor quality of many films (paying to see a rubbish film would be a waste)
  • Bootleggers make money
  • Search engines (torrents) (results for piracy come up on the first page of search engine)
  • It doesn't appear to be a victimless crime
  • The image film companies have of being very rich is undermined
  • Disengagement from cinema when there are so many other films of entertainment
  • For the fun of it


What are the industry doing to tackle it?

  • Taking legal action against illegal download sites
  • Prosecuting bootleggers
  • Encouraging consumers to use access sites such as Netflix
  • Working with search engines (e.g. Google), to change availability and profile of illegal download sites
  • Making films available more quickly
  • Advertising via exhibition platforms (creating awareness) (e.g. the "Piracy Ad" on film adverts)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The Hobbit" was the most pirated film of 2013, with 8.4 million people downloading it using BitTorrent networks.

"Django Unchained" took second place in the list, with 8.1 million downloads.

"Iron Man 3", the top grossing film of the year, also appeared on the list.

"The Hunger Games Catching Fire" did NOT feature on the list.

List of most pirated films of 2013:
  1. The Hobbit
  2. Django Unchained
  3. Fast and Furious 6
  4. Iron Man 3
  5. Silver Linings Playbook
  6. Star Trek Into Darkness
  7. Gangster Squad
  8. Now You See Me
  9. The Hangover Part 3
  10. World War Z

"The Pirate Bay", a file sharing site, has had to change its name six times in a bid to get around the site-blocking moves from several courts around the world order internet server providers (ISPs).
This site saw an increase in uploads of 50% during the past year with 2.8m files being listed.


Digital sales of video grew by 40% in 2013, helping to offset a 6.8% decline in sales of physical formats. This was helped by services like Spotify, Netflix and ITunes.

The overall UK music, video and games market was worth £5.4 billion in 2013, up 4% on 2012's total of £5.1 billion.

Friday, 7 March 2014

Film Funding and Social Media: Crowdfuning

Crowdfunding
  • finance to sustain an initiative from a large pool of backers (a crowd) usually made online by means of a web platform.
  • anyone with an idea can post their project on a crowdfunding site, and appeal for funding from the public or internet community.
  • for example:
    • indiegogo
  • the most successful crowdfunding site is:
    • Kickstarter
      • passed $1 billion (£599 million)
  • there are now over 9,000 websites registered with the word "crowdfunding".
  • it relies heavily in community generosity and interest.
  • these projects will often offer incentives to anyone who invests.
  • to qualify for funding from the BFI, the project has to meet a strict set of criteria based on a points system to prove its 'Britishness''.
  • many completed films never secure a distributor and do not get a release.
  • projects by unknown writers and directors are rarely considered.

  • Advantages
    • easy money.
    • anyone can open a crowdfunding project.
    • could exceed required budget.
    • filmmaking becomes accessible to public.
    • creative freedom to spend money.
    • creates sense of online community spirit.
    • don't have to apply for funding.

  • Disadvantages
    • high risk when no professional experience.
    • no intellectual property protection offered by the sites. Their idea can be taken/copied.
    • might not meet expectations.
    • tax - donations are a form of income and tax will have to be paid.
    • cannot control time management.
    • hard for potential investors to find you, because there are so many films on the website.
    • you don't know where the money has come from.
 
 
If celebrities use these websites, it may lead to more attention, more producers looking at it, and more money being put towards it.

Celebrities may look to these websites.

You can get rewards ; signed photo, etc.

 Example:

Faint Heart (2008)

·        The first feature film to be created using input from an online site.

·        The production was a collaboration between Myspace, Vertigo Films and Film4 under the name MyMovieMashup.

·        Cast and crew members were recruited through Myspace and professional Viking re-enactors were cast. Myspace has 120 million members world wide.

·        The film was made outside of traditional film industry practises although it does have professional input.
  • This film also stars well known actors, Eddie Marshan and Jessica Hynes, attracting more attention.

Myspace comes out ahead. It gets a cut of the profits if “Faintheart” is a smash. If not, it doesn’t lose any money as Myspace didn’t have to put up cash to get its producer credit. That’s how eager Vertigo was to tap its user base who from a ready made audience.

 

I think that crowdfunding could change the way film financing in the UK works. Marketing a film this way is more accessible for the public, and you do not have to apply for funding. Some well known actors have already been involved in some of the films advertised by crowdfunding, such as Benedict Cumberbatch. Because of this, it is likely to gain more attention, and more producers will show interest. Because there are so many films on crowdfunding websites, it may be hard for potential investors to find the film they want to invest in, but if there are more better known actors on it, there will be a higher amount of investors looking, therefore creating more of a chance that your film will be noticed, liked, and possibly invested in.

Because social media holds such an influence over everyone’s lives at this point in time, and it is likely it will continue too over the coming years, it is more likely to be noticed by people accessing these types of media and seeing these films. A great example is Faintheart, which was produced by Vertigo Films and Film 4, along with Myspace, which is accessed by over 120 million members worldwide. If films are advertised on these kind of social sites, especially big ones like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Vine, then they will attract more attention.

Sunday, 2 March 2014

The Disappearance of Alice Creed Showings and Gross


Overview

 
A rich man's daughter is held captive in an abandoned apartment by two former convicts who abducted her and hold her ransom in exchange for her father's money.

 
Released: 2009

Rated: 18

Country: UK

Language: English

Genre: Crime/Thriller

Director: J Blakeson

Writer: J Blakeson

Starring: Gemma Arterton, Eddie Marsan, Martin Compston

 

Showings

 

In the UK: 67 Screens

In then USA: 10 Screens

 

 

Gross

 

In the UK: £142,324

In the USA: $40,258

Friday, 28 February 2014

Time Warner


·         List of companies they own and in which mediums:

 

o       Film:

§         Warner Brothers

§         New Line Cinemas

§         HBO Pictures

o       TV:

§         Warner Brothers Animation

§         Looney Tunes

§         Warner Brothers Television

§         HBO

§         AOL

§         TimeWarner Cable

o       Music:

§         Warner Music (WMG)

o       Games:

§         Time Warner Interactive Entertainment Games

 

Convergence is where different media platforms are owned by a conglomerate, and can be put together, and this gives conglomerates a big advantage over smaller companies. This is because they will have no competition from any other company, and they will gain a much larger amount of money, as the money will come from each different media platforms, and will all go to the conglomerate, as it has ownership over each platform. A good example of this is Time Warner, who owns some of the main media platforms, and they own subsidiary companies such as New Line Cinema, Warner Bros. Animation, and DC Entertainment. Films can be made out of different platforms such as superhero magazines from DC/Marvel. They can do this by cross promoting, and make films such as The Dark Knight, Avengers Assemble, and so on. There will be very strong consumer awareness, and the consumers will be loyal and confident in buying the product, linking to the quality of the product assumed to be high in the consumer’s opinion. As mentioned before, cross promotion opportunities across mediums, known as synergy, are very high. If one business area is in decline, another will be in acceleration, whereas if a company only consists of a film business, which is in decline, it will be very hard to recover the situation, without another business there to help. However, there are some disadvantages, as the consumer has less choice to choose from. The business will require high quality business and financial management, so the company must employ trustworthy businessmen to keep the company on course. Smaller, independent companies will lose out, as they cannot compete with the immense diversification of much larger conglomerate.  There will be a lack of clear brand identity due to the business spread, which is convergence, and this may confuse the consumer, thus affecting sale of the product.

Digital Technology Case Study


Research into the use of digital technology within British film production, marketing and exhibition

Case Study:

 

Film: Shaun of the Dead

 

Main info: (useful to production, marketing and exhibition)

 

·        Country: UK/France/USA

·        Language: English

·        Filming Locations: All in London

 

·        Budget: £4,000,000

·        Opening Weekend: £1,603,410 (367 Screens)

·        Production Companies: Universal Pictures, StudioCanal,     Working Title Pictures, WT2 Productions, Big Talk Productions, Inside Track 2, FilmFour, De Wolfe Music

·        Distributors (UK): United International Pictures, Universal Home Entertainment

Film Exhibition List

Cinema - 1888

Television (terrestrial) - 1950s

Video - 1951

Satellite - 1967

Pay per view - 1970s

Internet - 1990s

DVD - 1995

Streaming - Late 1990s/Early 2000s

Blu-ray - 2002

Cinema NX and Working title films research


·        Cinema NX

 

o       Established in 2007.

o       One of the UK’s leading film financing and production groups.

o       They provide film and television producers with a unique combination of production expertise and experience of international film financing.

o       They manage the Isle of Man Film’s Media Development Fund.

o       NX oversees the entire physical production process, right through distribution of its properties.

o       It is continually expanding its operations by way of strategic partnerships and investment in media assets.

 

 

 

·        Working Title Films

 

o       Founded in 1983.

o       One of the world’s leading film production companies.

o       They have made over 100 films, which have grossed nearly $6 billion worldwide.

o       Working Title films collaborate with filmmakers, and well known actors, such as Rowan Atkinson, Keira Knightley, and Gary Oldman.

o       They have produced well known films such as Billy Elliot, Johnny English, Love Actually, and Nanny McPhee.